In recent years, Portugal has become a popular choice for wealthy Americans looking to live abroad. It was the ideal hideaway, with gorgeous beaches, cheap cost of living, and quick access to the United States.
Its "golden visa" programme, which allowed people to pay for citizenship and residency, was the main draw. Americans may obtain this sought-after status symbol for $500,000, making Portugal one of the top travel destinations for the very wealthy.
Portugal's golden visa initiative, though, is no longer as attractive. The Portuguese government has made significant modifications in response to mounting local criticism. Rich foreigners' inflow created a housing problem by driving natives out of the market.
As a result, the government restricted the visa programme and removed the possibility of obtaining residency by investing in residential real estate.
The resources of Portugal were insufficient to handle the spike in American immigration, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic, according to financial advisor Alex Ingrim. Now that wealthy Americans can no longer access Portugal's golden visa programme, they are looking for other options.
Rich Americans are travelling further as interest in Portugal's golden visa wanes. With advantages resembling those of Portugal's prior programme, France and Spain have become well-liked options. Because of its cultural appeal and residency investment opportunities, Spain in particular continues to be appealing.
Malta's well-established golden passport programme makes it stand out as well. Rich people find Malta to be a desirable alternative since it provides access to the European Union and citizenship, even though it is more expensive.
Apart from Europe, Turkey and Hungary are becoming more popular travel destinations, particularly with Chinese investors. In the meantime, tax advantages and convenient travel continue to draw billionaires to Caribbean countries like St. Kitts and Nevis, where they seek citizenship through investment.
Investment-based citizenship and residence are not new ideas. Such programmes have been available since the 1980s in places like Malta and St. Kitts & Nevis, but they have gotten more traction recently. Particularly, the COVID-19 epidemic drove a spike in applications, with the United States accounting for a large portion of this rise.
However regulatory oversight is becoming more intense. Restrictions on these programmes are being tightened by Ireland and the EU due to worries about money laundering and security threats posed by affluent people who request citizenship or residency in exchange for investments.
Locals began to turn against Portugal as a result of the wealthy foreigners who drove them out of the housing market and caused a housing crisis. To address these issues and lessen the program's negative effects on the housing market, the government made it more limited.
The tax ramifications are contingent upon the nationality of the individual and the tax regulations of the nation in which they acquire citizenship or residency. Investors should speak with tax professionals to learn about their responsibilities and possible advantages.